<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The deep woods of censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candleboy.com/2008/12/18/the-deep-woods-of-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candleboy.com/2008/12/18/the-deep-woods-of-censorship/</link>
	<description>The online journal of Vermont filmmaker, Bill Simmon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex C</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2008/12/18/the-deep-woods-of-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=169#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t that mean that 95% of music videos (and 99.9% of hiphop videos) are now objectionable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t that mean that 95% of music videos (and 99.9% of hiphop videos) are now objectionable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2008/12/18/the-deep-woods-of-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=169#comment-535</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ultimately, we on the VCAM board discovered that putting the power to filter unwanted content in the hands of the viewer was far more effective than censorship.&quot;

I can see it now: a safe search form were the viewer lists all of the things that they find objectionable.

the word fuck: check
breasts: check
penises: check</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ultimately, we on the VCAM board discovered that putting the power to filter unwanted content in the hands of the viewer was far more effective than censorship.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can see it now: a safe search form were the viewer lists all of the things that they find objectionable.</p>
<p>the word fuck: check<br />
breasts: check<br />
penises: check</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

