<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The real reason for YouTube&#8217;s recent content crackdown?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candleboy.com/2008/12/22/the-real-reason-for-youtubes-recent-content-crackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candleboy.com/2008/12/22/the-real-reason-for-youtubes-recent-content-crackdown/</link>
	<description>The online journal of Vermont filmmaker, Bill Simmon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crissa</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2008/12/22/the-real-reason-for-youtubes-recent-content-crackdown/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Crissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=172#comment-602</guid>
		<description>The law doesn&#039;t require a log-in for &#039;objectionable&#039; content, either.  And since they see no reason to police their users, I see no reason to log in to see videos, either.

This week, though, I had a link to a video pulled for violating their rules...

...It was a safety video demonstrating what happens when an older and newer type of electric car (or laptop) battery pack was pierced.

I have no idea how that was violating their rules, but now I can&#039;t show people that the 123 battery pack &lt;i&gt;doesn&#039;t explode&lt;/i&gt; when pierced.  Odd, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law doesn&#8217;t require a log-in for &#8216;objectionable&#8217; content, either.  And since they see no reason to police their users, I see no reason to log in to see videos, either.</p>
<p>This week, though, I had a link to a video pulled for violating their rules&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;It was a safety video demonstrating what happens when an older and newer type of electric car (or laptop) battery pack was pierced.</p>
<p>I have no idea how that was violating their rules, but now I can&#8217;t show people that the 123 battery pack <i>doesn&#8217;t explode</i> when pierced.  Odd, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

