<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Candleblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://candleboy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://candleboy.com</link>
	<description>The online journal of Vermont filmmaker, Bill Simmon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Defending and Defaming Watchmen by Chris Roberson</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2009/03/09/defending-and-defaming-watchmen/comment-page-1/#comment-4236</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Roberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=233#comment-4236</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have the feeling that if Zack Snyder directs music videos, he’s one of those directors that literally interprets song lyrics – so if the song has a lyric that goes “I’m drivin’ in my car, turn on the radio,” he shoots the singer driving his car and turning on his radio.&quot;

This is sometimes called the &quot;Lord Privy Seal.&quot; Wikipedia says: &quot;In the British television industry, Lord Privy Seal is the practice of matching too literal imagery with every element of the accompanying spoken script.&quot;

Richard Dawkins mentions it here:

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/2394</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have the feeling that if Zack Snyder directs music videos, he’s one of those directors that literally interprets song lyrics – so if the song has a lyric that goes “I’m drivin’ in my car, turn on the radio,” he shoots the singer driving his car and turning on his radio.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is sometimes called the &#8220;Lord Privy Seal.&#8221; Wikipedia says: &#8220;In the British television industry, Lord Privy Seal is the practice of matching too literal imagery with every element of the accompanying spoken script.&#8221;</p>
<p>Richard Dawkins mentions it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articles/2394" rel="nofollow">http://richarddawkins.net/articles/2394</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by Alex C</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>Sorry to beat a dead comment thread, but thanks to GameFly, I just played Marvel: Ultimate Alliance 2, a spastic button masher with explosions and XP, which was clearly the inspiration for Dragon Age 2.

;-)

(It&#039;s a pretty mediocre game, but at least they were trying to add RPG elements to a 3rd-person action game, not trying to dumb down a real RPG.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to beat a dead comment thread, but thanks to GameFly, I just played Marvel: Ultimate Alliance 2, a spastic button masher with explosions and XP, which was clearly the inspiration for Dragon Age 2.</p>
<p> <img src='http://candleboy.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(It&#8217;s a pretty mediocre game, but at least they were trying to add RPG elements to a 3rd-person action game, not trying to dumb down a real RPG.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by Alex C</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>Game Informer magazine agrees with me. From their Top 10 Disappointments of 2011 article:

Dragon Age II

Even as we marveled at the advancements in the Mass Effect series, longtime BioWare fans loved Dragon Age: Origins for sticking close to the company’s turn-based, epic fantasy past. However, the rushed and misguided sequel felt like a slap to that core audience, with its stripped down, shallow button-mashing combat, small world, repetitive dungeons, and poor storytelling. This was the rare BioWare title that felt rushed and - even worse - halfhearted.

Elder Scrolls Bugs

We love The Elder Scrolls V. It&#039;s our Game of the Year for a reason. You know what we don&#039;t love? Having to keep 100 different save files because we spend our time in Skyrim in constant fear of random, quest-breaking bugs. From skeleton dragons flying backwards to giants sending guards hurtling into orbit, we&#039;ve seen it all when it comes to bugs in this game. While patches have helped, your time in Skyrim may always be a buggy experience, and that&#039;s a shame.

(And they must be right, since according to their web site, &quot;Today, one in every forty people in the United States subscribes to Game Informer. With over 7 million paid subscribers, the popularity of the magazine has grown to become the 4th overall largest consumer publication in the United States.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Game Informer magazine agrees with me. From their Top 10 Disappointments of 2011 article:</p>
<p>Dragon Age II</p>
<p>Even as we marveled at the advancements in the Mass Effect series, longtime BioWare fans loved Dragon Age: Origins for sticking close to the company’s turn-based, epic fantasy past. However, the rushed and misguided sequel felt like a slap to that core audience, with its stripped down, shallow button-mashing combat, small world, repetitive dungeons, and poor storytelling. This was the rare BioWare title that felt rushed and &#8211; even worse &#8211; halfhearted.</p>
<p>Elder Scrolls Bugs</p>
<p>We love The Elder Scrolls V. It&#8217;s our Game of the Year for a reason. You know what we don&#8217;t love? Having to keep 100 different save files because we spend our time in Skyrim in constant fear of random, quest-breaking bugs. From skeleton dragons flying backwards to giants sending guards hurtling into orbit, we&#8217;ve seen it all when it comes to bugs in this game. While patches have helped, your time in Skyrim may always be a buggy experience, and that&#8217;s a shame.</p>
<p>(And they must be right, since according to their web site, &#8220;Today, one in every forty people in the United States subscribes to Game Informer. With over 7 million paid subscribers, the popularity of the magazine has grown to become the 4th overall largest consumer publication in the United States.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by Raedia</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4222</link>
		<dc:creator>Raedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4222</guid>
		<description>Alex - I never played DA Origins, but I got DA 2 for Xbox and I thought it was great. I&#039;m a big bioware fan and I love the stories and personalities they put in there. (I&#039;m playing Skyrim now, and I miss the unique individuals that DA had. Though Skyrim has a more fun and developed world, for sure). With combat, I really took advantage of the tactics system, so that I didn&#039;t have to micromanage during battles too much. YMMV though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; I never played DA Origins, but I got DA 2 for Xbox and I thought it was great. I&#8217;m a big bioware fan and I love the stories and personalities they put in there. (I&#8217;m playing Skyrim now, and I miss the unique individuals that DA had. Though Skyrim has a more fun and developed world, for sure). With combat, I really took advantage of the tactics system, so that I didn&#8217;t have to micromanage during battles too much. YMMV though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by billsimmon</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4221</link>
		<dc:creator>billsimmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4221</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe I forgot about Rise of the Planet of the Apes. I actually really liked that film. It doesn&#039;t change my best-of picks, but it&#039;s a runner up (despite the fact that, as Emily points out, the title contains a double &quot;of the,&quot; which is way awkward).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I forgot about Rise of the Planet of the Apes. I actually really liked that film. It doesn&#8217;t change my best-of picks, but it&#8217;s a runner up (despite the fact that, as Emily points out, the title contains a double &#8220;of the,&#8221; which is way awkward).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by Alex C</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 19:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>Rae - I have no problem with any of your game choices, except one. Dragon Age 2 was a huge disappointment for me. I found the combat to be spastic and irritating -- things are either moving too fast or paused at an arbitrary moment either just too soon or just too late to give an appropriate command -- and as with DA:O, I continue to find the world deliberately mundane and colorless.

Were you playing it on PC or console? I was on console -- do you think that makes a difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rae &#8211; I have no problem with any of your game choices, except one. Dragon Age 2 was a huge disappointment for me. I found the combat to be spastic and irritating &#8212; things are either moving too fast or paused at an arbitrary moment either just too soon or just too late to give an appropriate command &#8212; and as with DA:O, I continue to find the world deliberately mundane and colorless.</p>
<p>Were you playing it on PC or console? I was on console &#8212; do you think that makes a difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by Raedia</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4219</link>
		<dc:creator>Raedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4219</guid>
		<description>I scoff at your puny games review! Here are my favorites of the year, in approximate order:

Indie Games:
Stacking
Bastion
Iron Brigade
ilomilo

Big Releases:
Portal 2
Skyrim
Dragon Age 2
Gears of War 3
Deux Ex: Human Revolution
Assassin&#039;s Creed Revelations
Batman Arkham City
L.A. Noire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I scoff at your puny games review! Here are my favorites of the year, in approximate order:</p>
<p>Indie Games:<br />
Stacking<br />
Bastion<br />
Iron Brigade<br />
ilomilo</p>
<p>Big Releases:<br />
Portal 2<br />
Skyrim<br />
Dragon Age 2<br />
Gears of War 3<br />
Deux Ex: Human Revolution<br />
Assassin&#8217;s Creed Revelations<br />
Batman Arkham City<br />
L.A. Noire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 year in [geek] review by David Traver Adolphus</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/12/29/2011-year-in-geek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>David Traver Adolphus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=583#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>I went into Cap&#039;n America with high expectations, and Thor with extremely low ones. As a result I ended up severely disappointed with America, but thoroughly enjoyed Thor.

I&#039;d like to recommend Patrick Lee&#039;s 2010-2011 &quot;Breach&quot; trilogy, The Breach, Ghost Country and Deep Sky as the Sci-Fi of the year. In spite of certain appearances it is definitely Sci-Fi, and perhaps the best of its particular kind I&#039;ve read, in my 30-plus years of reading Sci-Fi. I actually can&#039;t say what it&#039;s specialty is without  a spoiler...suffice it to say, it&#039;s an incredible job of leading up the the conclusion of the third book (released this week).

Game of Thrones has bored me to tears. But then, I always thought the books were incredibly overrated potboilers. 

For games, I&#039;m still working on Dragon Age--although persistent DRM/add-on authorization problems have just about ruined it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went into Cap&#8217;n America with high expectations, and Thor with extremely low ones. As a result I ended up severely disappointed with America, but thoroughly enjoyed Thor.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to recommend Patrick Lee&#8217;s 2010-2011 &#8220;Breach&#8221; trilogy, The Breach, Ghost Country and Deep Sky as the Sci-Fi of the year. In spite of certain appearances it is definitely Sci-Fi, and perhaps the best of its particular kind I&#8217;ve read, in my 30-plus years of reading Sci-Fi. I actually can&#8217;t say what it&#8217;s specialty is without  a spoiler&#8230;suffice it to say, it&#8217;s an incredible job of leading up the the conclusion of the third book (released this week).</p>
<p>Game of Thrones has bored me to tears. But then, I always thought the books were incredibly overrated potboilers. </p>
<p>For games, I&#8217;m still working on Dragon Age&#8211;although persistent DRM/add-on authorization problems have just about ruined it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m just in it for the parking. by Matt</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2008/07/31/im-just-in-it-for-the-parking/comment-page-1/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=45#comment-4215</guid>
		<description>awesome!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rock Out With Your Caucus Out by Therem</title>
		<link>http://candleboy.com/2011/11/14/rock-out-with-your-caucus-out/comment-page-1/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>Therem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://candleboy.com/?p=573#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>Bill, I think it was a case of faulty procedure that led to this course of action. From what I was hearing on CCTV later, the rules about counting spoiled ballots aren&#039;t clear even in the by-laws. On the ballot itself, it says that any vote cast for a candidate who is no longer in the race will not count toward any total -- which could arguably mean the total vote count itself. In turn, that could change the amount of votes needed to achieve a majority.

Since there is ambiguity there -- and the possibility of lawyers getting involved and things getting truly divisive -- I can see why they decided to go with a resolution that both candidates could agreed upon.

Of course, if people hadn&#039;t already been there for 6 hours and gotten dog-tired, they wouldn&#039;t have been so keen to leave after the 3rd round vote. IRV could have solved that problem. Oh well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, I think it was a case of faulty procedure that led to this course of action. From what I was hearing on CCTV later, the rules about counting spoiled ballots aren&#8217;t clear even in the by-laws. On the ballot itself, it says that any vote cast for a candidate who is no longer in the race will not count toward any total &#8212; which could arguably mean the total vote count itself. In turn, that could change the amount of votes needed to achieve a majority.</p>
<p>Since there is ambiguity there &#8212; and the possibility of lawyers getting involved and things getting truly divisive &#8212; I can see why they decided to go with a resolution that both candidates could agreed upon.</p>
<p>Of course, if people hadn&#8217;t already been there for 6 hours and gotten dog-tired, they wouldn&#8217;t have been so keen to leave after the 3rd round vote. IRV could have solved that problem. Oh well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

